A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month.
With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers.
Yang did make a big mistake, as integrity should never be compromised, and this is a lesson that he should remember. However, we should also look at the system that pushes students forward and sometimes causes them to stumble along the way.
Did the medical schools originally accept Yang just because he claimed in his learning portfolio that he won a “best debater” award in a contest and that he never went to a cram school? Maybe not. Successfully gaining admissions to five prestigious medical schools means that his academic strength and potential must have been exceptional. After all, medical school admissions focus more on GSAT scores, as well as the following written test, oral interview and practical demonstrations rather than portfolios, which serve more as references.
The problem lies in that “diverse performance” is becoming a coliseum for entering higher education. Are some students being forced to perform a carefully choreographed, but potentially distorted, show on the academic stage that is the learning portfolio?
Of course, Yang’s exaggeration and embellishment of his portfolio should be seriously examined and corrected. Still, I cannot help but wonder: Is he the only one who has chosen to take this shortcut under the existing academic pressure? It is likely that this is just the tip of the iceberg, reflecting a strategy that many students need to adopt to stand out from the crowd. Such portfolios do not help relieve their school pressure. Due to the vague review standards and aspects of university admissions, some students have learned how to “please” the system, creating a perfect image to meet its expectations.
I would like to remind Yang: Setbacks can also make you stronger, and one fall does not equal permanent failure. The problem lies in the fact that you choose the wrong way to present yourself. This is a human error that can be corrected, rather than a birth defect that cannot be fixed. I wish you a “rebirth” through the test next month, and hope that you find the value of going to a medical school.
Lin Po-kuan is a junior-high school teacher in Tainan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS